Notes on Richard Rosecrance, "The Rise of the Virtual
State"
1. Capital, labor, and information are mobile; land is no longer important.
2. Focus now is on share of the world market.
3. So, like corporations which have dispersed their production
globally, now states need to "downsize" (reduce) territorially-based
production.
1. Not command resources
2. Rather, negotiate with foreign and domestic capital and labor to get them into our economic sphere, in order to stimulate growth.
3. Like multinational corporation headquarters, determines overall strategy, invests in its own people; does not amass production capability
4. Contracts out functions.
1. coordinate, stimulate and direct foreign investment by its enterprises
2. production doesn't have to take place at home
3. plays host to capital and labor of other countries
4. focus on: high value manufactured goods, design, marketing,
finance
1. capital and labor are key; and they are mobile
2. Post WWII, rise in prices of international services outpaced
rise in prices for manufactured goods
1. Result: corporate downsizing. Leads to increased efficiency, more output for less labor.
2. Rise of virtual corporation
a) research, development, marketing, finance as Headquarters functions
b) little if any manufacturing capacity (contracted out)
"Head but no body": Ultimate in corporate downsizing
1. The most efficient economies are those with minimal production
(for example Hong Kong)
1. downsizing: limited production capacity
2. relocation of production. For example
a) Switzerland: 98% of Nestle's production is abroad;
b) Holland, most goods are produced abroad;
c) US: 20% of US corporations' production is abroad.
3. focus on high-value-added-services;
a) services make up 70% of US GDP, 63% of high value category
(services = banking, software, media, telecommunications, accounting,
insurance, education, lawyers, entertainment, etc.)
1. Australia, Canada: "head" countries
2. China, India, Russia: future "Body" countries, production, manufacturing
But financed from outside (foreign investment)
1. Third World: way to overcome comparative advantage limits of past (raw materials, low-tech manufactures)
2. US: Can influence/ reshape comparative advantage: Focus on first 12 years of education.
a) upgrade teaching standards
b) raise pay for teachers
1. If elements of production are less tangible, war for territory doesn't pay
2. But: Population increases make territory more important?
a) technological development will resolve problems of scarcity
1. Political solutions of past (political reform, economic restructuring) don't work
2. State doesn't have powers it had in past, can't deal with
global problems
1. Will have to negotiate, attract foreign capital/investment
2. To attract foreign investment, must have:
a) low inflation
b) rising productivity
c) flexible and trained labor force
3. This will conflict with domestic interests, who would block correct strategy, demand more government spending, more benefits
4. But: domestic policies can't solve these problems. More
government spending would lead to insecurity over jobs, welfare,
medical care
1. US citizens need to know more about world
2. Middle managers and workers expect too much, learn too little
3. Displaced workers and businesspeople must be willing to look abroad for opportunities.